JAMES BROKENSHIRE UP SHIT CREEK
Please use our A-Z INDEX to navigate this site
JAMES BROKENSHIRE - Conservatives content to rape the countryside and still make no provision for low cost housing, causing a continuation of the renting society created by Margaret Thatcher.
A GOVERNMENT UP SHIT CREEK WITHOUT A PADDLE
James Brokenshire MP was responsible for drafting the National Planning Policy Framework leading up to publication in 2012 as the then Secretary of State. Fantastic!
This document said all the right things about a rolling stock of land for affordable housing, but then councils were allowed to do what they pleased. For example, Wealden has no rolling stock of land for affordable housing, neither 5 or 10 year plans.
And, they have been allowed to get away with it.
Saying something and doing another is the same as saying what was not said - i.e. we are not going to change a thing. In fact, we are going to make things worse.
The Wealden Action Group have been saying for years that we need a special police force to prosecute corrupt planning officials. In 1997 a Petition went to Sussex police, who proved how corrupt the system is by failing to investigate the report of 12 crimes.
Lord Nolan QC, said that no planning officer should occupy any local government position for more than 5 years. This was said of the police in respect of secret societies.
But the Nolan Report was ignored. Again, it said all the right things, but provided no action.
THE ACID (SHIT) TEST
number of concerned citizens wrote to Mr Brokenshire and Jeremy Wright
MP (Culture Media & Sport) in 2018, but their prayers were not
answered. Both MP's took the fifth amendment, deciding not to get
involved, presumably to preserve their political careers. For to get
involved would have meant to admit that their policies were not working.
The Secretary of State is a person that has a duty to protect the public from threats to peaceful enjoyment of property - as it concerns planning and communities - and of course the right to life as per Article 2 of the HRA 1998.
This is a Duty as per Section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 to act compatibly with Articles 2 and Article 1 of Protocol 1 - and where he knows that a matter brought to his attention for the possibility of a call in, he has to be sure that the developers and the local authority properly considered the consequences of any violation of neighbours Human Rights, which in this present matter, the parties did not:
Acts of public authorities.
(1) It is unlawful for a public
authority to act in a way which is incompatible with a Convention right.
When taken in the context of a development that threatens peaceful enjoyment of a water supply, it must then be the duty of the Environment Agency, Wealden District Council and the Secretary of State for Communities, to ensure that the developers: Latimer Developments Ltd., and Clarion Housing Group Ltd., do not carry out any development that threatens to breach the right to peaceful enjoyment.
A looming case involving a well and potential water contamination, where the property developers Latimer Developments and Clarion Housing Group Limited purchased land at Herstmonceux in East Sussex, from Timothy Watson (possibly via others) with the intention to build houses on a slope directly feeding ground water to the well that is the only and original source of water to a historic site and the occupants of old generating buildings dating from 1909. Where gardens are planned and garages for cars are included, it is likely that pesticides used ordinarily by gardeners, and or oil spills from motor vehicles (and the like) will eventually soak into the groundwater such as to contaminate the water that is used for drinking and washing, etc. Whereas, the state must protect the occupants of the building from a real or potential threat of contamination such as to avoid threatening the continued use of such amenity, but that neither the developer, nor the Wealden District Council, took care to avoid an exclusion zone typically 100 one hundred meters upstream of Lime Well, contrary to Protocol 1, Article 1, the right to peaceful enjoyment of property and the right to life, as guaranteed by Article 2 of the HRA 1998.
TONY BLAIR - Mistakes can be forgiven, attacking another country based on bogus intelligence is unforgivable. It is trying to justify what amounts to murder with bullshit.
WHAT IS A SHIT CREEK?
A creek is a small stream or a narrow, sheltered waterway, especially an inlet in a shoreline or channel in a marsh. "A sandy beach in a sheltered creek." A Shit Creek is a situation that is untenable, akin to be in a rowing boat in a river of shit, without any means of escaping the crap you are sitting in, because you have no oars.
ARE THEY SURE? - Southern Water say these are essential improvements. But are they? Many concerned residents are of the opinion that the village was already overloaded. Meaning that these works are more profiteering from over-development of the countryside. It's hot enough already without raising the temperature of planet earth more!
LINKS & REFERENCE
Please use our A-Z INDEX to navigate this site