CABINET MEMBERS 2026 SIR KEIR STARMER LABOUR'S MINISTERS AND SECRETARIES OF STATE BRITISH GEVERNMENTS MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT HOUSE OF COMMONS LORDS

LABOUR AT ONE YEAR: A GOVERNMENT UNDER PRESSURE AS PROMISES COLLIDE WITH REALITY

As Labour marks its first full year in power, the mood in Westminster is far from celebratory. What began in July 2024 with a landslide victory and a pledge to “restore trust” in politics has, according to multiple media outlets, descended into a difficult first year marked by stalled reforms, internal turbulence, and a growing chorus of accusations that the party is failing to deliver on its promises. The government’s own supporters admit the shine has worn off. Critics say the cracks are widening.

A YEAR OF HIGH HOPES - AND HARD LANDINGS

When Sir Keir Starmer entered Downing Street, he promised a new era of competence, stability, and delivery. But as Full Fact notes, the government has “nowhere near enough action to restore trust,” despite Starmer’s vow that trust could only be rebuilt through “actions not words”.

The i Paper’s review of Labour’s manifesto pledges paints a similar picture: progress in some areas, but “big challenges ahead” as the government struggles to match its rhetoric with results.

The “Broken Promises” Narrative: What the Media Are Highlighting

Below is a breakdown of the key promises the media say Labour has failed to deliver — or has delivered too slowly — in its first year.

1. Economic Growth: “Growth, Growth, Growth” Becomes a Headache

Labour’s flagship economic promise was to deliver strong, stable growth. But the Express reports that the first year has produced “weaker growth, higher taxes, rising unemployment, and borrowing through the roof” — a far cry from the “pro‑business” revolution promised by Rachel Reeves. The narrative is simple and damaging: the economy is not improving fast enough, and the government is running out of excuses.

2. Housing: A Revival That Hasn’t Materialised

Labour promised a “housing revival,” including major reforms and accelerated building. But the i Paper notes that progress has been slow, with planning bottlenecks and local resistance stalling delivery. The resignation of Angela Rayner — the minister responsible for housing — only intensified scrutiny.

3. NHS Reform: Still in Crisis

The manifesto promised sweeping NHS reform, shorter waiting lists, and improved access. One year on, the media consensus is that the NHS remains in crisis, with little visible improvement. Sky News’ data analysis shows that key performance indicators have not shifted significantly in Labour’s first year.

4. Immigration: “Smash the Gangs” Still a Distant Goal

Labour pledged a tougher stance on illegal immigration and promised to “smash the gangs.” But the i Paper reports that the government has struggled to make meaningful progress, with operational and diplomatic challenges slowing reforms. Indeed, the current trend appears to allow councils to build homes for the unprocessed, asylum seekers, in villages such as Herstmonceux. Giving developers added incentives to brush aside heritage assets, such as Herstmonceux Museum. Possibly, the earliest surviving electricity generating station, dating from C. 1896.

5. Trust and Standards in Public Life: A Promise Undermined by Events

Starmer’s promise to restore trust in politics has been repeatedly tested. Full Fact highlights that the government has failed to take the “key actions” needed to improve political behaviour and transparency, despite being urged to do so immediately after taking office. The Rayner resignation saga — involving tax and conduct questions — has been widely interpreted as a blow to Labour’s credibility. But, that is nothing compared to allowing rampant corruption in local council's to go unchallenged. Once again bringing into focus, Wealden District Council's efforts to bury the heritage on their doorstep. By simply not compiling a local list. And, refusing to consult statutory consultees. There is also the matter of knob-ling councillor and MPs who ask awkward questions. Those who expressed delight at the historic find on their doorstep, but after raising the issue with their Chief Executive, and planning department, were told to keep their mouths shut. so much for their Codes of Conduct. Gutless wonders? You may ask. Or, just sheep copping hold of their expenses, as a reward for staying silent?

THE CONTROVERSIES: A GOVERNMENT FIGHTING ON MULTIPLE FRONTS

Beyond policy delivery, Labour’s first year has been marred by political turbulence.

1. Cabinet Instability and the Rayner Fallout

Angela Rayner’s resignation triggered a major Cabinet reshuffle and raised questions about internal discipline. Media outlets describe the reshuffle as a “reset” forced by crisis rather than strategy.

2. Lack of Clear Governing Philosophy

The Institute for Government argues that Labour “has yet to set out a clear governing philosophy,” warning that the government risks becoming “less than the sum of its parts”. This critique has gained traction across the political spectrum.

3. Delivery vs. Expectation Gap

Sky News’ anniversary analysis shows that Labour’s performance on key metrics is mixed at best, fuelling the perception that the government is struggling to meet its own benchmarks.

4. Economic Headwinds and Public Frustration

With inflation pressures, slow growth, and rising taxes, the public mood has soured. The Express frames Labour’s first year as “broken dreams” on the economy — a narrative the opposition has eagerly amplified.

A Government at a Crossroads

One year in, Labour faces a difficult truth: the expectations created by its landslide victory now threaten to overwhelm it. The media narrative of “broken promises” is gaining momentum, and the controversies of the first year have left the government vulnerable.

Yet the story is not finished. Labour still has time — and a large majority — to turn its fortunes around. But the next year will require clarity, discipline, and visible delivery if Starmer hopes to regain control of the narrative.

For now, the verdict from the press is clear: Labour’s first year has been turbulent, underwhelming, and politically costly.

A giant in the legal world. Taking on the task of cleaning up corruption in our town halls. Outstanding. Reform, watch out. This man will take a lot of beating.

The Chancellor who sucked pensioners dry. The blood sucking vampire, who is killing the geese that lay the golden eggs. Though, with good socialistic intentions. She really needs to incentivise the creators of wealth in the UK, instead of putting hurdles in their way.

YVETTE COOPER

Foreign Secretary. She at least identified China as a security risk. With Taiwan manufacturing around 60% of computer chips, no wonder Xi Jinping has his eyes on the Island, that defies Beijing.

SHABANA MAHMOOD

Shabana Mahmood, the Home Secretary. Safer with her here, than dealing with Justice.

LISA NANDY

Culture Secretary (DCMS). Who is doing what she can, where she can. But will she stick her neck out to save heritage assets, in the face of developer pressure to build on green belt?

STEVE REED

Secretary Housing, Communities and Local Government. Another giant lead, in the world of planning corruption. looking to make councillors and councils more accountable. Commendable!

Secretary Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). New to the fray. Will she allow Charles Church, Clarion and Persimmon, to poison an Ancient Well, putting anyone buying a home in the firing line for a strict liability offence?

JOHN HEALEY

Defence Secretary. Fighting to save our armed forces, with not much left in the kitty to arm our brave fighting men. Look to drones. Cost less, and don't sacrifice lives, which is where Putin is a butcher. Vladimir does not care about his men, but even he is developing drones for when he takes on NATO members. The less said about our Astute submarines, the better. John needs to look at procurement fraudsters. And consider persistent naval drones, before it is too late.

WES STREETING

Health Secretary and Social Care. Wow, not much has changed. Still massive waiting lists, cannot see a doctor, as infrastructure is stretched beyond breaking point. And, forget your teeth. Dentists are a distant memory. Reform can make hay here. But it will be hard going.

ED MILLIBAND

Energy secretary & Net Zero. Full marks to this gallant knight of renewables. He gets a lot of flak. Should be looking to a hydrogen network (Grid), as alternative storage and load levelling. Unfortunately, requires knowledge of physics, that MPs don't have, and worse still. Technology change, that even fewer understand. Nevertheless, he is a champion, who Reform will find hard to beat.

BRIDGET PHILLIPSON

Education secretary & Minister for equalities. Now here is some good news for Labour. Reform watch out. Nor bad exam results, despite rampant truancy. The internet is training students as to how to avoid working, then joining the benefits system for a life on the dole. Perhaps more re-education is required. Make gaming consoles illegal without a government health warning.

PAT MCFADDEN

Work and Pensions. Yup. What is the point of saving and working all of your life if the chancellor can completely destroy your retirement plans? Then again, there are a whole bunch of freeloaders.

Secretary Transport. Not sure she is going the right way. Hampered of course by Rachel's taxations. We'll hold fire on Heidi. She may find a way to clean up HGVs and shipping, using green hydrogen. Hope so for the sake of the planet.

HILARY BENN

Jeez, what with Rachel and Liz Kendall on his case. Business and Trade in the UK, is taking a nose dive. Reform could not fail to outperform this trio, with a little imagination, and software that works for honest directors, not against them.

LIZ KENDAL

MOVED TO: Secretary of State for Science, Technology and Innovation, the department who introduced the Gov.One-Login catastrophe that looks to be another dis-incentive to entrepreneurs in the UK, combined with potential human right issues. What a nightmare! She's handing the next election to Reform on a plate.

JOHNATHAN REYNOLDS

MOVED TO: Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury (Chief Whip)

JAMES MURRAY

Also attends cabinet. Not sure he's contributed anything of note in the Justice department. Or securing human rights for honest company directors. Meaning that he is complicit?