REDUCING SEXUAL NEEDS IN SINGLES
On the assumption that Prince Andrew really is "Randy Andy," his sexual needs might have been gratified legally and without risk of claims against him, if he'd used an artificial companion. It is food for thought. Safer in terms of population growth too, where he's raised a family. Imagine what joy for Bojo, who has a high libido, and propensity to spawn siblings with the greatest of ease. We might have had a few less scandals, if Mr Johnson had a Fembot in his household. Preferably one with a higher IQ than it's master.
If you don't want children, and your partner is cold in the bedroom department, a robotic sex toy may be the answer. Such devices mat also prevent unwanted pregnancies and so reduce population growth.
You may be better off with an artificial companion. Sex robots and humanoid companions are now quite popular. They are a whole lot safer. A robot cannot accuse you of rape or sodomy. Though, one might imagine, the civil servants then trying to charge a sex tax. Especially the female civvies, who no doubt will hate the idea of losing control over men. Indeed, such expressions have already been aired by the media. Robots could undermine the flesh trades, in the process, making a whole lot of people happier. So, why not prescribe them on the National Health? Replace marriage, with a different kind of agreement, should a couple decide to procreate. In order for this to work, robots would have to be very appealing to the end users. It's all down to the curves and bumps in the right places - emulating evolution of course. The birth rate may fall dramatically among advanced thinkers, while those less able to afford automaton lovers, would no doubt continue like rabbits as before. Thus to reduce populating growth, we need to make mechanized companions cheaper. And then there is AI.
There is also the matter of companionship. Apart from risk free sexual gratification in the legal sense, a modern Fembot or Manbot can be programmed to converse. Be heterosexual, bi, lesbian, or homosexual.
The very thought of such freedom for men, from female oppression, has already sparked much opposition from women's right groups. But what are they talking about? They cannot remove the right of men to engage in harmless sexual activity with machines, because they use vibrators and dildos all the time.
“It was sexual intercourse,” the judge
Jan 2022], according to Newsweek reporter Jack Royston. “Involuntary sexual intercourse.
There isn’t any doubt about what that
means, at least not since someone else was in the White House.”
OR IMMORAL - In the future we may not become such useless beings, if
offered the choice. Where
you might legally marry a girl in Spain and
Tahiti at 13 (we think), you can have a robot companion at any age in
any country, free of legal claims.
LINKS & REFERENCE
Please use our A-Z INDEX to navigate this site
This website is provided on a free basis as a public information service. copyright © Injustice Alliance 2021