Please use our A-Z INDEX to navigate this site



Timothy Watson, Heathfield Market owner and estate agent


TIM WATSON - Is seen here in the field adjacent to the well, that it is alleged he must have known he would be poisoning in making his application to develop this field in 2014. It is alleged that he used his influence to persuade the councils to pass his application in outline form, then passed that consent (in principle) to a professional property development company in 2015, to distance himself - but not far enough we hope - that he carries the can for at least part of the corporate crimes that will follow, if something serious is not done to stop them. There is no indemnification against criminal statute Tim! We wonder if Tim has heard of the Ten Commandments.




In 2014, Timothy Frank Watson, a former auctioneer and estate agent, and owner/operator of Heathfield Market, Tim Watson was also a chartered surveyor. Hence, when he applied for planning permission for 70 houses on a field adjacent to Lime Cross at Herstmonceux, he was looking at the site with an expert eye, and must have notice the slope towards the well he'd been admiring.


In making his application many believe he was selling out for 30 pieces of silver - or rather more in £pounds sterling - so emulating Judas Iscariot. Many locals view his application as anti-social. Watson lives in Cowbeech, at Thorndean Farm, BN27 4JH, according to Companies House records.


It is understandable really, he was getting on a bit and had invested in this field years ago. If he didn't strike while the iron was hot, he might lose the opportunity that he had (presumably) been hoping for, otherwise, why buy the land? Nobody can blame him for wanting to profit from his investment in some degree, but was that a good enough reason to flout the underlying planning principles contained in the National Planning Policy Framework, and the Local Plan, and so ruin the lives of many locals?


In 2015, a near identical application followed in the name of a company, the reasons for which change of applicant are unclear, except perhaps for being once removed for posterity. If Mr Watson would care to enlighten us, we will publish his reasons in the interest of fair and balanced reporting. Links to the pre-conditions imposed by Wealden District Council are seen below.


Though what some might agree was a crap decision, Wealden passed the application in principle, in the process ignoring hundreds of local protestors. The Parish council were patsies, literally ignoring the wave of local protests, to assist their chums at Wealden. So much for representation of the people. They were actually representing the interests of their wallets and certain members with undeclared interests, allegedly.


Of course the Parish is not independent, with influence from District councillors and East Sussex, and of course MP Huw Merriman.




Crap decision making





 -  Conditions Index A - Z
1. Permission subject to detailed particulars
2. Appearance & Landscape

3. Application for reserved matters in 3 years

4. No dev. without archaeological programme

5. No dev. until written scheme 4. published

6. Contamination to be reported subsequently

7. Details code of construction TB approved

8. Temporary contractor provisions

 9.  Noise restrictions working hours

10. Details brickwork finishes
11. Joinery details, windows, doors

12. Details hard & soft landscaping

13. Details screening, trees, hedges

14. Planting trees Chapel Row, Museum

15. Landscape management plan

16. Wildlife management details

17. Japanese Knotweed survey

18. Access prior to building works

19. Visibility splays entrance A271

20. Internal site access roads

21. Car parking details

22. Garages no commercial use

23. No felling trees hedgerows

24. Tree protection existing TPO

25. Bins refuse collection & disposal

26. Foul drainage sewerage works

27. Surface water drainage

28. No discharges foul water

29. Flood resilient buildings

30. Surface water drainage

31. Light pollution AONB

32  Renewable energy

33. No permitted dev buildings

34. No permitted gates/fences

36. Limited to included docs




The land in question was sold to a consortium of developers at a price higher than they should have paid, thought to include Clarion Housing Group, Gleeson Developments, Latimer Developments and Thakeham Homes, but not necessarily all of them and there may be other later developments, such as selling on, that remains to be investigated.


The fact is that with £millions of pounds of profits at stake, the developers are sure to push hard and in so doing are prone to ignore potential pitfalls, such as groundwater pollution of the only local well in constant use as a water supply.


Indeed, the developers have denied that pollution in the form of pesticides and car oils, if spilt by the purchasers of the proposed new dwellings at Lime Cross, would find its way into the well serving the old generating complex. They have pooh, pooed the notion that rain water flows downhill and soaks into soil, carrying with it any soluble chemicals that may be harmful to human health. 






Such denial of the obvious, suggests that those steering the proposed development may not be the full ticket mentally. For every person with normal understanding of rain and water flow, agrees that water is subject to gravity, and so flows down hills and slopes, etc. Logically then, if it rains on the slopes above the well adjacent to Lime Park, then natural soakage will mean that what began as rainfall, will end up feeding the groundwater, then water table or aquifer, that supplies the well.


When that happens, any spillages and chemicals used by the new owners or occupiers of houses on those slopes (such as on their gardens) will find its way into the drinking water supplies of the users at the old generating buildings - and that is a "strict liability" criminal offence - for which the homeowners will be prosecuted by the Environment Agency, as will anyone in the chain the caused, or brought about a situation that was inevitable, or could reasonably have been foreseen.


The only mitigation is that the real people to blame are the developers, and the council who allowed the development to proceed without making allowances and proper precautions. Being what is know as a joint-enterprise, each party would be treated as being the principle offender. It would seem that will include Timothy Watson, for making the original application and benefiting from the sale of the land to the developers. And that is because Mr Watson knew about the well. Something that was discussed with one of the occupiers across the hedge, during one of his several visits to the field in question.




Judas Iscariot is well known for accepting 30 pieces of silver as blood money for betraying Jesus Christ. Tim Watson was paid handsomely by the developers for the field at Lime Cross.



The contractors for sewage disposal in Herstmonceux, as relates to this application and the subsequent detailed application is Southern Water. It appears that they are complicit in the matter, seeking to help the developers undermine Conditions. Such impropriety is unhelpful to say the least, but if part of a conspiracy to abuse process, can be something rather more serious, carrying with it a possible life sentence.


Southern Water are used to dealing with shit. Shit is their bread and butter, physically and legally. They appear not to care about pumping shit from Church Road, via the A271, Gardner Street, to Victoria Road, despite the un-sustainability of such proposals and potential backwash to the village issues.


But there is more than mere human excrement to the matters raised, the whole sordid story is held to be pretty foul in the telling. Because, the development is outside the village boundary and a no-go area in planning terms. How then did both Parish and Wealden councils pass the application, no questions asked - despite such strong local opposition?



Councillors failing to declare their interests


Local councillors are trained like chimps to never admit impropriety. But where they know most of the local landowners, they frequently fail to register their interests. Hence, the Register of (conflicts) of interest is remarkably bereft of entries. In itself a measure of the dishonesty you may encounter when confronting a local council. How then can you rely on any decision they make?



As to affordable housing, it is likely that as the developers in the chain of ownership have overpaid for this parcel of land, that they may have priced themselves out of business, and will therefore seek to argue that they should not abide by the agreement to build 30 affordable homes, but seek to dilute that split on the basis of diminished viability.


Worse still, they may seek additional housing in this location, but if they do, even closer scrutiny should be applied to any future application, that may then demand 50% affordable housing, and tighter safeguards against poisoning the historic well in the adjacent Park.




THIRTY PIECES OF SILVER - To ruin the lives of hundreds of villagers, as Conservative Pothole Politics is turning our villages into housing estates, and opportunist property investors are jumping on the BoJo bandwagon, to get in on the act. It was Margaret Thatcher who sold out young families, when she sold off council social housing stocks, and failed to put in place any policy changes to replace affordable homes. Indeed, that was her agenda, to screw the less well of even more: "Screw the Poor, Even More."



On that score, it is buyer beware, the Courts have held that where a developer has overpaid for land, that that does not give them good reason to avoid their duty to provide low cost housing - even it it means that a development will not go ahead.


It is therefore for Wealden to insist that the developers build the affordable housing first, to avoid any ruses such as insolvency, as excuses to get out of the contract agreed. This is simply a breach of contract situation, where it seems reasonable to us that any court would uphold any council's insistence on affordable development up front on the basis of case precedent.


See: Parkhurst Road Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities And Local Government & Anor [2018] EWHC 991 (Admin).




JUNE 2020 - Southern Water are nearing the turning into Chapel Row with their pooh pipe. 





When looked at under a magnifying glass, the decision to build a pumping station off Chapel Row (Church Road), and pump the putrid defecations up hill to meet with the A271, and then along Gardner Street to Victoria Road, adds more potential problems to an already problematic installation.





MAY 2020 - Southern Water getting stuck into their newest shit pumping station in Herstmonceux, Sussex. Human feces (or faeces) are the solid or semisolid remains of food that could not be digested or absorbed in the small intestine of humans, but has been rotted down by bacteria in the large intestine. It also contains bacteria and a relatively small amount of metabolic waste products such as bacterially altered bilirubin, and the dead epithelial cells from the lining of the gut. It is discharged through the anus during a process called defecation. 







1. Permission subject to detailed particulars
2. Appearance & Landscape

3. Application for reserved matters in 3 years

4. No dev. without archaeological programme

5. No dev. until written scheme 4. published

6. Contamination to be reported subsequently

7. Details code of construction TB approved

8. Temporary contractor provisions

 9.  Noise restrictions working hours

10. Details brickwork finishes
11. Joinery details, windows, doors

12. Details hard & soft landscaping

13. Details screening, trees, hedges

14. Planting trees Chapel Row, Museum

15. Landscape management plan

16. Wildlife management details

17. Japanese Knotweed survey

18. Access prior to building works

19. Visibility splays entrance A271

20. Internal site access roads

21. Car parking details

22. Garages no commercial use

23. No felling trees hedgerows

24. Tree protection existing TPO

25. Bins refuse collection & disposal

26. Foul drainage sewerage works

27. Surface water drainage

28. No discharges foul water

29. Flood resilient buildings

30. Surface water drainage

31. Light pollution AONB

32  Renewable energy

33. No permitted dev buildings

34. No permitted gates/fences

35. Limited to included docs















Please use our A-Z INDEX to navigate this site