PLATINUM JUBILEE 70 YEARS
THE SUN - Has referred to 2022 as the Queen's second Annus Horribilus, the first being in 1992. The sex scandal involving the former Prince Andrew, now stripped on his HRH and military honours, looks set to haunt the institution that is the Royal Family. What does that mean for the Monarchy. Would anyone want to sit on that throne?
In light of the impending Platinum 70th year Jubilee celebrations, we wonder if the former Prince Andrew, Duke of York, may want to think about apologizing to Virginia Guiffe, in addition to giving her a handsome compensation package - for many reasons. Not least is that the Queen is now 96 years old in 2022.
Even if the Queen's second son does not recall the incidents, where he is alleged to have met with the Claimant, as per the Claims lodged in New York. He could still reach out to her with an apology, for any distress he may have caused. He could offer a no-fault compensation package, that may allow other Royals and the British Institution, known as 'The Firm,' to eventually recover from the media fallout.
We imagine that Ms Giuffre will know that she has caused the Duke immeasurable personal character damage and financial harm the world over, that will go down in history, probably less so than Henry the Eighth's propensity for younger wives and head chopping, but nevertheless as the modern equivalent. Where in Henry's day his word was law, a bit like Adolf Hitler, who passed similar legislation in Nazi Germany. But that is another story, except that the Royals were caught on camera emulating the Nazi salute - before Britain was drawn into the conflict that became World War Two.
One might argue, that whatever emotional distress Ms Guiffe suffered, has now been rained down in equal or greater proportion, as to qualify as Just Satisfaction (in human rights terms). The young Virginia may have even had a crush on the Prince 20 years ago, being cast aside and not contacted; presumably.
BRITISH SEX LAWS
With the Duke of York accused of rape the Sexual Offences Act 2003 says a claimant is to be believed during police investigation stages, and when they parties enter a Crown Court. There does not need to be a shred of evidence as to an actual physical encounter, just potential opportunity - and the assertion by the claimant. David Blunkett took away the Article 6 protections, where a person is to walk into a court innocent, until proven guilty. In the UK, you are guilty until proven innocent. For that little human rights abomination, the MP who was having an extra marital affair - thus generating a conflict of interests (blow jobs in exchange for expunging male rights) changed to law. But how many blow jobs did it take, allegedly, you might ask? Women's Rights activists will go to almost any lengths to gain equality, to the point of superiority.
Regardless of these wrongs, and as the Queen passed the offending Act into law, we are sure she is now looking at what she has done, where such actions may now see her son Andrew doing time at an HMP, presumably, with maximum security. For he would then be a convicted sex offender. Lucky for Randy Andy, there is no 'hard labour,' just cushy jobs mopping floors, or preparing food. And he can watch TV and play video games, with earned privileges. He'd probably serve 3-4 years of a 7-8 year sentence - with good behaviour. Maybe more if there was oral and/or anal sex. At least he'd keep his properties, as these would not be proceeds of crime - or at least we think not.
With such a case precedent, many more royals may become targets, with ever so much more elaborate schemes, to trap the unwary. David Blunkett may then come in for some stick, for removing the Article 6 human rights of men and women in the UK.
Though, we doubt a jury would convict a woman, if a man cried rape. Hence, the Sexual Offences Act 2003, is aimed at men specifically and deliberately - as well the lobbyists know. Has there ever been a conviction of a woman for raping a man in the UK? What are the statistics.
The fact Britain also rewards war criminals, and allows a prime minister to lie to the Crown and get away with it, does not bode well - once the voting public realize that their Head of State is not keeping the UK safe from corruption, but is actually perpetuating it.
And then there is the honours system for sale. If you've got the cash, you can more or less, buy into the Firm, according to many media articles making or inferring such allegations. The honours system infects and corrupts British Courts, police and prosecuting authorities. Taking away their independence. The Queen is also a Patron of part of the Masons. The Masons is a secret society, with obscure rituals, bordering on satanic in style with aprons and other paraphernalia that the ordinary person would raise an eyebrow over. Even Italy bans secret societies - and they have the Mafia.
According to BBC Newsnight and Independent articles, Britain is the most corrupt country, with London the money laundering capital of the world. Whistleblowers are ruined with a 100% success rate, apparently. Meaning that the whistle is almost never blown. David Cameron talked about transparency, but did nothing (blah, blah, blah). Boris Johnson of PartyGate fame, has steered clear of this corruption, despite campaign promises! Does that not ring a few alarm bells?
LESSONS TO BE LEARNED - THERE ARE VERY FEW SWEET INNOCENTS
If you are a single man, no matter how easy it is being made for you (and that should be illegal), stay clear of girls who may be under the age of consent, or simply too easy. Young girls will lie about their age to entrap you. Even when legally eligible for sexual activity, make sure they are not part of a bigger picture to sweeten a deal, and not being paid by someone else to perform sexual favours. The CIA and FBI do it all the time. The CID and MI6 entrap males all the time. It's all part of obtaining secret information, typically to bribe or blackmail their targets. Or, just plain and simple entrapment.
Our advice is to audio record all such encounters, making sure to ask a girl's age and background such that you have her answer on record. Ask who the potential sexual conquest is working for, she may inadvertently slip up. Be wary of casual sex. It's not worth the bother. Not too mention the risk of infection. Get yourself a Fembot. No infection and sex on demand, to suit your diary. Zero entrapment, until robots get rights in law.
Single parents are prone to entrap males with offers of easy sex. The consequences can be dire. In the UK, you only have to have had an opportunity, to be convicted. It is as bad as the witch trials of old. Do not put yourself in that position, where you have no witnesses. Run! Do not feel sorry for single parent traps. They are like spiders waiting to snare the uninitiated - and they all know what they are doing. They will set you up. Never send a kind card that is saucy. They will save those and use them to convince a jury that you are a bad person. Sadly, a jury will always believe a female claimant, never a male defendant. Shock horror! The man is always the bad partner.
How do the women know how to ensnare foolish men?
all watch, and some record episodes of soaps featuring under age sex scenarios. In the UK "The Bill" and "Casualty" were
recorded by one claimant. The police in that case (still waiting for an
appeal) did not and will not secure a crime scene for a defendant. The
opposite is true. They will bury evidence likely to assist a defendant,
to gain an easy conviction - despite their Code of Conduct saying
otherwise. They won't mind if they stitched their victim up. Look at the
Guildford Four and Birmingham Six. All stitched up. It's part of the
British justice system. Bent coppers, doing favours for mates via SLAPP
actions. And equally corrupted cops failing to investigate serious
planning crime and banking fraud.
committed by a nation against it's own citizens are dealt with by the International
Criminal Court, as per the Rome
Statute. This is where the State concerned refuses to accept they
are acting illegally. Nobody is above the law, including royalty by
NOW IS THE TIME FOR CHANGE - Under the present system where the Head of State is a royal, and there is no written constitution, politicians like David Cameron and Boris Johnson can lie with impunity - even to Queen Elizabeth - and not face penalties. Police officers can shoot unarmed civilians and not be sent to prison, and planning officers can deceive the Secretaries of State and High Court judges, and not be prosecuted. In effect, it is alleged that there is little justice in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. We aver that such machinations are costing the ordinary taxpayer, Treasury and the Crown (being the state) significant sums of money, while adding to the UK's carbon footprint. Hence, the country is not being run effectively by the at present; defective administration, not to serve its citizens, but to sustain and profit itself. Unlike the US Constitution of 1791 that exists to serve the people. The honours system does not help, rather undoing the idea of an award, where some recipients of awards are for not revealing the truth, denying appeals, etc. Rather, then doing anything heroic, creative or scientific.
LINKS & REFERENCE
Please use our A-Z INDEX to navigate this site
This website is provided on a free basis as a public information service. copyright © Injustice Alliance 2022